\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
How to Establish ‘Minor Discrepancies’ under EU Design Law? Some Thoughts on T-25/23
2025
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DataCite | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Cite
Citation
Details
Title
How to Establish ‘Minor Discrepancies’ under EU Design Law? Some Thoughts on T-25/23
Author
Item Type
Journal article
Description
1 electronic resource (page 845–848)
Summary
On 23 October 2024, in Case T-25/23, the General Court of the EU, for the first time found, in essence, that a registered EU design which consists of views that are not conclusive and present at least two different designs must be deemed invalid. Surprisingly, despite its potential impact on the validity of countless registered EU designs, the decision has not yet attracted the attention that it should have received amongst those interested in EU design law. While the outcome of T-25/23 is beyond doubt, the standards suggested to be applied for reaching that result are less persuasive.
Source of Description
Crossref
Series
GRUR International ; 74, 9, 2025, 2632-8550.
Linked Resources
Published
[Oxford, England] : Oxford University Press (OUP), 2025.
Language
English
Copyright Information
https://academic.oup.com/grurint/article/72/3/231/6998505
Record Appears in