\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
How to Establish ‘Minor Discrepancies’ under EU Design Law? Some Thoughts on T-25/23
2025
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DataCite | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Cite
Citation
Détails
Title
How to Establish ‘Minor Discrepancies’ under EU Design Law? Some Thoughts on T-25/23
Author
Type d’élément
Journal article
Description
1 electronic resource (page 845–848)
Résumé
On 23 October 2024, in Case T-25/23, the General Court of the EU, for the first time found, in essence, that a registered EU design which consists of views that are not conclusive and present at least two different designs must be deemed invalid. Surprisingly, despite its potential impact on the validity of countless registered EU designs, the decision has not yet attracted the attention that it should have received amongst those interested in EU design law. While the outcome of T-25/23 is beyond doubt, the standards suggested to be applied for reaching that result are less persuasive.
Source of Description
Crossref
Série
GRUR International ; 74, 9, 2025, 2632-8550.
Ressources liées
Published
[Oxford, England] : Oxford University Press (OUP), 2025.
Langue
Anglais
Copyright Information
https://academic.oup.com/grurint/article/72/3/231/6998505
Le document apparaît dans