\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
Description of representation and indication of product under EU design law: a critical review of the tangle created in case T-202/22, TA Towers v EUIPO
2025
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DataCite | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Details
Title
Description of representation and indication of product under EU design law: a critical review of the tangle created in case T-202/22, TA Towers v EUIPO
Author
Item Type
Journal article
Description
1 online resource (pp. 126–141)
ISSN
2045-9807 (Print)
2045-9815 (Online)
2045-9815 (Online)
Summary
Under European Union trademark law, the mandatory indication of the goods and services according to the Nice Classification is paramount for assessing the scope of protection of a mark (except for a mark with a reputation). Likewise, using a description of the mark may be relevant when determining the subject matter of the mark (where a description is required or recommended). Things are different, for very good reasons, under established EU design law and practice. Unfortunately, a recent decision of the EU’s General Court (T-202/22, TA Towers v EUIPO, ECLI:EU:T:2024:28) departs from these standards and opens Pandora’s box.
Series
Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property ; Volume 15, Issue 1
Linked Resources
Published
[Northampton, England] : Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2025.
Language
English
Copyright Information
https://www.elgaronline.com/page/Conditions%20of%20use/terms-and-conditions
Record Appears in