\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
格式
| 格式 | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DataCite | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Cite
Citation
详细记录
Title
Should the Unified Patent Court Set FRAND Terms?.
Author
项目类型
Journal article
描述
1 electronic resource (page 342-350)
数字对象唯一标识符
摘要
Matthias Leistner recently addressed the question of how the Unified Patent Court should implement the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Huawei v. ZTE in patent infringement proceedings involving a FRAND defence (GRUR Patent 2024, 327). In this context, he takes the view that the Unified Patent Court could and should – like the English courts – determine the terms of a FRAND licence agreement in the case of mutually ‘willing’ parties who are neither able to agree on the terms of such an agreement nor willing to accept a binding provision and its modalities by an arbitration tribunal or a third party. This article attempts to shed light on the prerequisites and limits of such a judicial FRAND determination.
Source of Description
Crossref
丛编
GRUR International ; 74, 4, 2025, 2632-8550.
连续资源
Published
[Oxford, England] : Oxford University Press (OUP), 2025.
语言
eng
Copyright Information
https://academic.oup.com/grurint/article/72/3/231/6998505
记录出处