\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
Formatos
| Formato | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DataCite | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Cite
Citation
Detalles
Título
Should the Unified Patent Court Set FRAND Terms?.
Tipo de elemento
Journal article
Descripción
1 electronic resource (page 342-350)
Resúmen
Matthias Leistner recently addressed the question of how the Unified Patent Court should implement the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Huawei v. ZTE in patent infringement proceedings involving a FRAND defence (GRUR Patent 2024, 327). In this context, he takes the view that the Unified Patent Court could and should – like the English courts – determine the terms of a FRAND licence agreement in the case of mutually ‘willing’ parties who are neither able to agree on the terms of such an agreement nor willing to accept a binding provision and its modalities by an arbitration tribunal or a third party. This article attempts to shed light on the prerequisites and limits of such a judicial FRAND determination.
Source of Description
Crossref
Serie
GRUR International ; 74, 4, 2025, 2632-8550.
Recursos vinculados
Publicado
[Oxford, England] : Oxford University Press (OUP), 2025.
Lengua(s)
eng
Derechos de autor
https://academic.oup.com/grurint/article/72/3/231/6998505
El registro aparece en