\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
CJEU excludes retroactive application of reformed language of Article 7(1)(e)(iii) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation and does (not) clarify what ‘another characteristic’ means
2019
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DataCite | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Cite
Citation
Details
Title
CJEU excludes retroactive application of reformed language of Article 7(1)(e)(iii) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation and does (not) clarify what ‘another characteristic’ means
Imprint
Oxford University Press (OUP) 2019
Item Type
Journal article
Description
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 14, 8, 2019, pp. 590-592
ISSN
Online: 1747-1540
Print: 1747-1532
Print: 1747-1532
Summary
CJEU, Textilis Ltd and Ozgur Keskin v Svenskt Tenn Aktiebolag, C-21/18, EU:C:2019:199, 14 March 2019
Source of Description
Crossref
In
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
Linked Resources
Language
English
Copyright Information
https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model
Record Appears in
Added Corporate Author