\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
CJEU excludes retroactive application of reformed language of Article 7(1)(e)(iii) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation and does (not) clarify what ‘another characteristic’ means
2019
格式
| 格式 | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DataCite | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Cite
Citation
详细记录
Title
CJEU excludes retroactive application of reformed language of Article 7(1)(e)(iii) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation and does (not) clarify what ‘another characteristic’ means
版本项
Oxford University Press (OUP) 2019
项目类型
Journal article
描述
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 14, 8, 2019, pp. 590-592
国际标准期刊编号
Online: 1747-1540
Print: 1747-1532
Print: 1747-1532
数字对象唯一标识符
摘要
CJEU, Textilis Ltd and Ozgur Keskin v Svenskt Tenn Aktiebolag, C-21/18, EU:C:2019:199, 14 March 2019
Source of Description
Crossref
发表于
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
连续资源
语言
eng
Copyright Information
https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model
Added Corporate Author