\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
Antitrust, Innovation, and Competitiveness
1992
T 23 JOR.A
Disponible à WIPO Library
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DataCite | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Articles
Détails
Titre
Antitrust, Innovation, and Competitiveness
Auteur
Description
viii, 244 pages ; 25 cm
ISBN
9780195067699 Print
Autre cote
T 23 JOR.A
Résumé
This book explores how the U.S. antitrust laws, especially the Sherman Antitrust Act, have affected the ways in which U.S. corporations can form alliances to compete in world markets. The editors start from the premise that current antitrust laws unwisely restrain innovation by inhibiting desirable pro-competitive communication and cooperation between firms. This results in an impediment to the performance of U.S. firms competing in industries experiencing rapid technological change. Not all of the contributors agree with the editors about the degree to which the antitrust laws do indeed inhibit U.S. industry. Thus, the book represents a variety of views on a topic of increasing importance.
Bibliographie, remarque
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Remarque du contenu formatté
1. Introduction
2. Antitrust law as industrial policy: should judges and juries make it?
3. Innovation, cooperation, and antitrust
4. Antitrust: source of dynamic and static inefficiencies?
5. Agreements between competitors
6. Ignorance and antitrust
7. Antitrust lenses and the uses of transaction cost economics reasoning
8. Monopoly conduct, especially leveraging power from one product or market to another
9. Market structure and technical advance: the role of patent scope decisions
10. Conclusion.
2. Antitrust law as industrial policy: should judges and juries make it?
3. Innovation, cooperation, and antitrust
4. Antitrust: source of dynamic and static inefficiencies?
5. Agreements between competitors
6. Ignorance and antitrust
7. Antitrust lenses and the uses of transaction cost economics reasoning
8. Monopoly conduct, especially leveraging power from one product or market to another
9. Market structure and technical advance: the role of patent scope decisions
10. Conclusion.
Publié
New York : Oxford University Press, 1992.
Langue
Anglais
Le document apparaît dans