\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
Antitrust, Innovation, and Competitiveness
1992
T 23 JOR.A
Available at WIPO Library
Formatos
| Formato | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DataCite | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Detalles
Título
Antitrust, Innovation, and Competitiveness
Autor
Descripción
viii, 244 pages ; 25 cm
ISBN
9780195067699 Print
Número de llamada alternativo
T 23 JOR.A
Resúmen
This book explores how the U.S. antitrust laws, especially the Sherman Antitrust Act, have affected the ways in which U.S. corporations can form alliances to compete in world markets. The editors start from the premise that current antitrust laws unwisely restrain innovation by inhibiting desirable pro-competitive communication and cooperation between firms. This results in an impediment to the performance of U.S. firms competing in industries experiencing rapid technological change. Not all of the contributors agree with the editors about the degree to which the antitrust laws do indeed inhibit U.S. industry. Thus, the book represents a variety of views on a topic of increasing importance.
Nota de bibliografía, etc.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Nota de contenido con formato
1. Introduction
2. Antitrust law as industrial policy: should judges and juries make it?
3. Innovation, cooperation, and antitrust
4. Antitrust: source of dynamic and static inefficiencies?
5. Agreements between competitors
6. Ignorance and antitrust
7. Antitrust lenses and the uses of transaction cost economics reasoning
8. Monopoly conduct, especially leveraging power from one product or market to another
9. Market structure and technical advance: the role of patent scope decisions
10. Conclusion.
2. Antitrust law as industrial policy: should judges and juries make it?
3. Innovation, cooperation, and antitrust
4. Antitrust: source of dynamic and static inefficiencies?
5. Agreements between competitors
6. Ignorance and antitrust
7. Antitrust lenses and the uses of transaction cost economics reasoning
8. Monopoly conduct, especially leveraging power from one product or market to another
9. Market structure and technical advance: the role of patent scope decisions
10. Conclusion.
Publicado
New York : Oxford University Press, 1992.
Lengua(s)
eng
El registro aparece en