\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
Re-examining the "wild" story of the ayahuasca plant patent
2024
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DataCite | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Détails
Titre
Re-examining the "wild" story of the ayahuasca plant patent
Auteur
Type d’élément
Journal article
Description
1 online resource
Résumé
The US plant patent for a variety of ayahuasca vine named ‘Da Vine’ has been viewed as an archetypal case of "biopiracy," a term for the use of intellectual property rights to misappropriate biodiversity and traditional knowledge. However, in the attempt to get the plant patent revoked and in the criticism of the US Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) decision to uphold the patent, lawyers and scholars have misrepresented USPTO procedures and the jurisprudence on the Plant Patent Act of 1930. This article calls into question the prevailing narrative about the ayahuasca plant patent to show how the rights of Indigenous peoples might be better protected under plant patent law.
Source of Description
Crossref
Série
Intellectual Property Quarterly ; I.P.Q. 2024, 2, 136-162
Ressources liées
Publié
[New York, NY] : Thomson Reuters, 2024.
Langue
Anglais
Informations relatives au droit d’auteur
https://1.next.westlaw.com/Copyright
Le document apparaît dans