\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
Solutions to the Problem of Therapeutic Antibody Genus Claims
2024
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DataCite | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS | |
Title
Solutions to the Problem of Therapeutic Antibody Genus Claims
Author
Item Type
Journal article
Description
1 online resource
Note
The Federal Circuit has insisted, in cases such as Ariad Pharmaceuticals v. Eli Lilly (Fed. Cir. 2010), that the legal requirements for enablement and for written description are to be considered as distinct portions of 35 U.S.C. § 112(a). Enablement of an antibody genus claim requires evidence that, at the desired priority date, a person of skill in the art could achieve the full scope of the claim “without undue experimentation.” In contrast, written description requires evidence that, at the desired priority date, the inventor had “possession” of the full scope of the claim.
Source of Description
Crossref
Series
AIPLA Quarterly Journal, Summer 2024, Volume 52, Issue 3, p. 513.
Linked Resources
Published
[New York, NY] : Thomson Reuters, 2024.
Language
English
Copyright Information
https://1.next.westlaw.com/Copyright
Record Appears in