\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DataCite | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Citer
Détails
Titre
AI innovation and a ‘person skilled in the art’
Auteur
Type d’élément
Journal article
Description
1 online resource (pages 643–644)
Résumé
In an editorial published in May 2024,1 we examined the test for inventive step, where the ‘person skilled in the art’ is endowed with limited talents (a ‘donkey’) when determining whether the invention is non-obvious, but exhibits great expertise (a ‘genius’) when deciding whether the disclosure of the invention is sufficiently clear and complete. In this editorial, our person skilled in the art provides a further argument against treating innovations created solely by Artificial Intelligence (AI) as suitable for protection under patent law.
Série
Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 20, 10, 2025.
Ressources liées
Publié
Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press, 2025.
Langue
Anglais
Informations relatives au droit d’auteur
https://academic.oup.com/pages/using-the-content/citation
Le document apparaît dans