\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
The Bastard of the Arts and Copyright Law : The Intersection of Dance and Copyright Law in Hanagami V. Epic Games, Inc.
2025
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DataCite | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Details
Title
The Bastard of the Arts and Copyright Law : The Intersection of Dance and Copyright Law in Hanagami V. Epic Games, Inc.
Author
Item Type
Journal article
Description
1 online resource (pages 104-123)
Summary
This case note reviews and analyzes two different circuit courts’ approaches to evaluating copyright claims for choreographic works. In Hanagami v. Epic Games, Inc., a professional dancer and choreographer, Kyle Hanagami, sued the creators of the well-known video game, Fortnite Battle Royale, for copyright infringement. While the District Court for the Central District of California granted the video game company’s motion to dismiss, finding that Hanagami’s choreography would not be protectable, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case after it conducted a comprehensive and profound analysis of the choreographic work in question. In addition to analyzing the court’s application of copyright protections for choreographic works, this case note compares and contrasts the Ninth Circuit’s approach with that of the Second Circuit in its adjudication of choreographic works. Then, the facts and circumstances of Hanagami’s copyright infringement lawsuit against Epic Games are viewed in light of how choreographic works are analyzed in both circuit courts. This case note argues that while the Ninth and Second Circuits apply different analyses when evaluating copyright claims for choreographic works, the Ninth Circuit reigns more advantageous for protecting choreographic works, as its analysis is segmented, sequential, and thorough in its evaluation of choreographic details. Such details have the power to tip the scale in determining whether the choreographic work is protected under copyright law. Therefore, the Second Circuit’s approach should be abandoned, and the Ninth Circuit’s approach should be preferred.
Source of Description
Crossref
Series
John Marshal Review of Intellectual Property Law, Volume 24, Issue 2, 2025, page 104-123
In
John Marshal Review of Intellectual Property Law
Linked Resources
Published
[Chicago, Illinois] : UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law, 2025.
Language
English
Copyright Information
https://repository.law.uic.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1528&context=ripl
Record Appears in