\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DataCite | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Details
Title
Taking ‘Due Account’ of Equivalents
Item Type
Journal article
Description
1 online resource (page 1079–1083)
Summary
Headnotes by the Editorial Office 1. There are two approaches to taking due account of equivalents when determining the scope of protection of a patent. In the first approach, the patent is interpreted in one step, and equivalents are directly considered when seeking the middle ground between protecting the patent holder’s interests and ensuring legal certainty for third parties. The second approach involves two steps. If the patent claim cannot be interpreted to mean that all of its features are reflected in a third party’s product or process (first step), then – if the patent holder’s argument so warrants – it is examined whether the element that deviates from a feature included in the claim is equivalent to that feature and whether it is therefore still appropriate to include the product or process within the patent’s scope of protection (second step).
Source of Description
Crossref
Series
GRUR International ; 73, 11, 2024, 2632-8550.
Linked Resources
Published
[Oxford, England] : Oxford University Press (OUP), 2024.
Language
English
Copyright Information
https://academic.oup.com/grurint/article/72/3/231/6998505
Record Appears in