000049424 000__ 03368cam\a22003615i\4500
000049424 001__ 49424
000049424 003__ SzGeWIPO
000049424 005__ 20240601171847.0
000049424 006__ m    e   d        
000049424 008__ 240425s2016\\\\enk\\\\\\\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000049424 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1431905300
000049424 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000049424 041__ $$aeng
000049424 084__ $$aG 81 WER.S
000049424 1001_ $$aDe Werra, Jacques,$$eauthor.
000049424 24510 $$aSpecialised Intellectual Property Courts- Issues and Challenges.
000049424 264_1 $$aGeneva, Switzerland :$$bInternational Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD),$$c2016
000049424 300__ $$a77 pages.
000049424 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000049424 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000049424 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000049424 4901_ $$aGlobal Perspectives and Challenges for the Intellectual Property System,$$x2414-343
000049424 5050_ $$aAbbreviations and Acronyms -- Foreword -- About the Authors of the Second Issue and Editors of the Series -- Introduction / Xavier Seuba -- Part One: Specialised IP Courts: Issues and Challenges / Jacques de Werra -- Executive Summary -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 Specialised Courts for Intellectual Property Disputes -- Concept of specialised IP courts -- Broad diversity of IP disputes and of national and regional IP dispute resolution systems -- 1.3 Advantages and Disadvantages of Specialised IP Courts -- Advantages -- Disadvantages -- 1.4 Policy Choices -- 1.5 Conclusion -- Part Two: Current Situation in Selected Emerging Countries -- 2. Specialised Intellectual Property Courts in Brazil / Denis Borges Barbosa and Pedro Marcos Nunes Barbosa -- 3. Specialised Intellectual Property Courts in China / Hong Xue -- 4. Specialist IP Adjudication: The Indian Experience / Shamnad Basheer -- 5. Specialised Intellectual Property Courts in Africa: The Case of Uganda / Susan Isiko Štrba
000049424 520__ $$aLack of enforcement of a particular legal system puts into question its actual relevance. In the case of intellectual property, the significance of enforcement has been expressed in many different ways. Sometimes delicate metaphors - "without effective enforcement, IPRs are nothing but empty shells"1 - have been made, and on other occasions the relevance of enforcement has been conveyed in a more descriptive fashion. For instance, "the value of intellectual property rights depends in practice on whether the holder can take effective measures to prevent others from infringing them,"2 or "without effective remedies for the enforcement of these rights, the rights are worthless."3 It is in this context that the relevance of intellectual property litigation must be assessed. Judicial adjudication and enforcement transforms substantive protection into reality and, equally important, places intellectual property norms in connection with the norms integrating the broader legal framework to which they belong.
000049424 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000049424 650_4 $$aInternational law$$xLaw and legislation.
000049424 7102_ $$aInternational Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD)
000049424 830_0 $$aGlobal Perspectives and Challenges for the Intellectual Property System.
000049424 85641 $$uhttps://www.ceipi.edu/websites/ceipi/Documents/Publications_CEIPI___ICTSD/CEIPI_ICTSD_N__2.pdf$$yView eBook
000049424 903__ $$aGlobal Perspectives and Challenges for the Intellectual Property System
000049424 904__ $$aBook
000049424 980__ $$aOS
000049424 980__ $$aBIB