000049265 000__ 01415cam\a22003735i\4500
000049265 001__ 49265
000049265 003__ SzGeWIPO
000049265 005__ 20240708162305.0
000049265 006__ m    eo  d        
000049265 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000049265 008__ 240321s2010\\\\enk\\\\\\\\\\u000\0\eng\d
000049265 022__ $$a2044-7175
000049265 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1427545249
000049265 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000049265 041__ $$aeng
000049265 043__ $$ae-uk---
000049265 084__ $$aGB 139
000049265 24500 $$aShould EU Trademark Law act as a "muzzle" to brand reference lists?
000049265 264_1 $$aLondon, England:$$bInforma, U.K.$$c2010.
000049265 300__ $$aGB 139 July 2010 ;$$c[28] cm
000049265 336__ $$atext$$2rdacontent
000049265 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000049265 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000049265 520__ $$aWhen was the last time an English court has launched such overt criticism of a ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union, as happened in the recent case of L'Oréal v Bellure?  Having strongly objected, however, the Court of Appeal did exactly what it should do...and duly applied the ruling that it had just criticised.
000049265 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000049265 650_0 $$aTrademarks$$xLaw and legislation$$zEuropean Union.
000049265 650_0 $$aTrademarks.
000049265 650_0 $$aPatents.
000049265 7001_ $$aGershlick, Paul,$$eauthor.
000049265 7001_ $$aArnold, Matthew,$$eauthor.
000049265 903__ $$aIntellectual Property Magazine
000049265 904__ $$aJournal article
000049265 942__ $$cART$$jGB 139 July 2010$$2ddc
000049265 980__ $$aBIB
000049265 999__ $$c28508$$d28508