000049229 000__ 01597cam\a22003615i\4500
000049229 001__ 49229
000049229 003__ SzGeWIPO
000049229 005__ 20240708162318.0
000049229 006__ m    eo  d        
000049229 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000049229 008__ 240321s2010\\\\enk\\\\\\\\\\u000\0\eng\d
000049229 022__ $$a2044-7175
000049229 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1427545134
000049229 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000049229 041__ $$aeng
000049229 043__ $$ae-uk---
000049229 084__ $$aGB 139
000049229 24504 $$aThe Google effect: what next?
000049229 264_1 $$aLondon, England:$$bInforma, U.K.$$c2010.
000049229 300__ $$aGB 139 June 2010 ;$$c[28] cm
000049229 336__ $$atext$$2rdacontent
000049229 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000049229 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000049229 520__ $$aJames Martin of Field Fisher Waterhouse sets out practical advice for keyword service providers, advertisers and trademark proprietors as a result of the Google France ruling   After the fanfare of publicity has died down following the ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") on 23 March 2010 in the combined Google France SARL and Google Inc. cases (C-236/08 to 238/08) against Louis Vuitton Malletier SA and others, many issues still remain uncertain and the approach that the CJEU has taken risks inconsistent outcomes in different Member States which will only become apparent on a case-by-case basis.
000049229 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000049229 650_0 $$aTrademarks.
000049229 650_0 $$aKeyword searching.
000049229 650_0 $$aPatents.
000049229 7001_ $$aMartin, James,$$eauthor.
000049229 903__ $$aIntellectual Property Magazine
000049229 904__ $$aJournal article
000049229 942__ $$cART$$jGB 139 June 2010$$2ddc
000049229 980__ $$aBIB
000049229 999__ $$c28508$$d28508