\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
Decision Quality and Errors in Content Moderation.
2024
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DataCite | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Détails
Title
Decision Quality and Errors in Content Moderation.
Type d’élément
Journal article
Description
1 online resource (pages 139–156)
Résumé
In certain instances, algorithmic content moderation by online platforms is a process with binary outcomes: those that are “right” and those that are “wrong”. And, in a copyright content moderation context, this binary nature, in principle, holds true: the ultimate question is simply, “Is this content illegal?” However, some content moderation decisions are more straightforward than others that require more robust assessment, whether by domain experts, or even the courts. This article explores the relationship between errors in content moderation decision-making and decision quality, as well as how errors are addressed in the Digital Services Act and the Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market.
Source of Description
Crossref
Série
International Review of Intellectual Property Law & Competition Law ; Volume 55, Issue 1.
Ressources liées
Published
New York: Springer LINK, 2024
Langue
Anglais
Copyright Information
CC BY 4.0
Le document apparaît dans