TY  - GEN
N2  - In certain instances, algorithmic content moderation by online platforms is a process with binary outcomes: those that are “right” and those that are “wrong”. And, in a copyright content moderation context, this binary nature, in principle, holds true: the ultimate question is simply, “Is this content illegal?” However, some content moderation decisions are more straightforward than others that require more robust assessment, whether by domain experts, or even the courts. This article explores the relationship between errors in content moderation decision-making and decision quality, as well as how errors are addressed in the Digital Services Act and the Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market.
AB  - In certain instances, algorithmic content moderation by online platforms is a process with binary outcomes: those that are “right” and those that are “wrong”. And, in a copyright content moderation context, this binary nature, in principle, holds true: the ultimate question is simply, “Is this content illegal?” However, some content moderation decisions are more straightforward than others that require more robust assessment, whether by domain experts, or even the courts. This article explores the relationship between errors in content moderation decision-making and decision quality, as well as how errors are addressed in the Digital Services Act and the Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market.
T1  - Decision Quality and Errors in Content Moderation.
AU  - Schwemer, Sebastian Felix,
JF  - International Review of Intellectual Property Law & Competition Law
VL  - Volume 55, Issue 1
LA  - eng
ID  - 49145
KW  - Intellectual property.
KW  - Data protection.
KW  - Content analysis (Communications)
KW  - Copyright.
KW  - Intellectual property.
KW  - Patents.
TI  - Decision Quality and Errors in Content Moderation.
LK  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-023-01418-4
UR  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-023-01418-4
ER  -