TY  - GEN
AB  - In certain instances, algorithmic content moderation by online platforms is a process with binary outcomes: those that are “right” and those that are “wrong”. And, in a copyright content moderation context, this binary nature, in principle, holds true: the ultimate question is simply, “Is this content illegal?” However, some content moderation decisions are more straightforward than others that require more robust assessment, whether by domain experts, or even the courts. This article explores the relationship between errors in content moderation decision-making and decision quality, as well as how errors are addressed in the Digital Services Act and the Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market.
AU  - Schwemer, Sebastian Felix,
ID  - 49145
JF  - International Review of Intellectual Property Law & Competition Law
KW  - Intellectual property.
KW  - Data protection.
KW  - Content analysis (Communications)
KW  - Copyright.
KW  - Intellectual property.
KW  - Patents.
LA  - eng
LK  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-023-01418-4
N2  - In certain instances, algorithmic content moderation by online platforms is a process with binary outcomes: those that are “right” and those that are “wrong”. And, in a copyright content moderation context, this binary nature, in principle, holds true: the ultimate question is simply, “Is this content illegal?” However, some content moderation decisions are more straightforward than others that require more robust assessment, whether by domain experts, or even the courts. This article explores the relationship between errors in content moderation decision-making and decision quality, as well as how errors are addressed in the Digital Services Act and the Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market.
T1  - Decision Quality and Errors in Content Moderation.
TI  - Decision Quality and Errors in Content Moderation.
UR  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-023-01418-4
VL  - Volume 55, Issue 1
ER  -