000049141 000__ 03649cam\a22004455i\4500
000049141 001__ 49141
000049141 003__ SzGeWIPO
000049141 005__ 20240708150418.0
000049141 006__ m    eo  d        
000049141 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000049141 008__ 240321s2024\\\\nyu\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000049141 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1427546148
000049141 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000049141 041__ $$aeng
000049141 24500 $$aWhen Copyright Meets Digital Cultural Heritage :$$bPicturing an EU Right to Culture in Freedom of Panorama and Reproduction of Public Domain Art.
000049141 264_1 $$aNew York:$$bSpringer LINK,$$c2024
000049141 300__ $$a1 online resource (pages  37-65)
000049141 336__ $$atext$$2rdacontent
000049141 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000049141 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000049141 4901_ $$aInternational Review of Intellectual Property Law & Competition Law ;$$vVolume 55, Issue 1
000049141 520__ $$aOver the years, there has been an increasing interest in cultural heritage, particularly within the digital context. This has brought to light numerous opportunities and challenges that however require a careful consideration of fundamental rights, such as the public’s entitlement to participation in cultural life, i.e. the right to culture. Preserving the communal aspect of cultural heritage is pivotal in unlocking the full potential of the right to engage in cultural activities. Within the intricate landscape of norms and policies encompassing diverse and often competing interests, the primary focus of this analysis is on the copyright acquis, which may be optimised for the public’s enjoyment of digital culture. This article aims to establish connections between two EU copyright provisions: the Freedom of Panorama (FoP), a discretionary exception under Art. 5(3)(h) of the Directive on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (InfoSoc), allowing the reproduction of cultural goods visible from public places, and the reproduction of visual artworks in the public domain under Art. 14 of the Directive on copyright in the digital single market (CDSMD). Through a comparative analysis of how certain Member States have implemented these provisions, this article proposes potential paths for a balanced and thoughtful assessment of the interests related to digital cultural heritage that should lead to advancing the right to culture. While it would be wise to consider a supra-national legislative intervention that mandates the FoP exception, Member States should at the same time uphold the scope of Art. 14 of CDSMD, especially when it might be pre-empted by other regulations, such as those governing cultural heritage. By examining the foundations of these two provisions and seeking their nuanced interpretation, the authors anticipate the coexistence of a vital component of the EU right to culture, while acknowledging that the journey toward its comprehensive realization is far from over.
000049141 542__ $$fCC BY 4.0
000049141 588__ $$aCrossref
000049141 590__ $$aPublished online: 2024
000049141 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.$$zEuropean Union.
000049141 650_0 $$aCopyright$$zEuropean Union.
000049141 650_0 $$aCulture and law.
000049141 650_0 $$aHuman rights.
000049141 650_0 $$aCopyright.
000049141 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000049141 650_0 $$aPatents.
000049141 7001_ $$aDore, Giulia,$$eauthor.
000049141 7001_ $$aTuran, Pelin,$$eauthor.
000049141 7731_ $$tInternational Review of Intellectual Property Law & Competition Law
000049141 7731_ $$wIIC
000049141 830_0 $$aInternational Review of Intellectual Property Law & Competition Law ;$$vVolume 55, Issue 1.
000049141 85641 $$uhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-023-01408-6$$yonline version
000049141 904__ $$aJournal article
000049141 980__ $$aIIC