Factors That Deny the Existence of Inventive Step.

Journal article

1 online resource (pages 60–62)

Patent Act 2014, Art 22(2) – Single-Nozzle Tire Valve Headnotes by the Editorial Office 1. Factors that deny the existence of inventive step include ‘motivation to combine multiple references’, ‘simple modification’ and ‘mere scraping together’. 2. The subject matter can be interpreted as being a ‘simple modification’ of the cited technical contents if a person skilled in the art can utilise ordinary knowledge at the time of application to simply reshape, replace, bypass or repurpose, etc. by using the different technical features in the evidence when solving a technical problem. Supreme Administrative Court, judgment of 29 December 2022 – 111-Year-App-Zih-No. 366 In the matter of the patent opposition among the parties, the appellant appealed the judgment (judgment of 16 March 2022 – 111-Year-Adm-Pat-Suit-Zih-No. 31) from the administrative dispute. This Court delivers the following judgment: Order The first paragraph of the main text of the original judgment and the portion of litigation expenses are reversed; the case is remanded to the IP and Commercial Court.

Crossref

GRUR International ; 73, 1, 2024, 2632-8550.

[Oxford, England] : Oxford University Press (OUP), 2024.

English

https://academic.oup.com/grurint/article/72/3/231/6998505

External Online Journals > GRUR