@article{49135,
      recid = {49135},
      title = {Factors That Deny the Existence of Inventive Step.},
      pages = {1 online resource (pages 60–62)},
      abstract = {Patent Act 2014, Art 22(2) – Single-Nozzle Tire Valve   Headnotes by the Editorial Office 1. Factors that deny the  existence of inventive step include ‘motivation to combine  multiple references’, ‘simple modification’ and ‘mere  scraping together’.  2. The subject matter can be  interpreted as being a ‘simple modification’ of the cited  technical contents if a person skilled in the art can  utilise ordinary knowledge at the time of application to  simply reshape, replace, bypass or repurpose, etc. by using  the different technical features in the evidence when  solving a technical problem.  Supreme Administrative Court,  judgment of 29 December 2022 – 111-Year-App-Zih-No. 366 In  the matter of the patent opposition among the parties, the  appellant appealed the judgment (judgment of 16 March 2022  – 111-Year-Adm-Pat-Suit-Zih-No. 31) from the administrative  dispute. This Court delivers the following judgment:  Order  The first paragraph of the main text of the original  judgment and the portion of litigation expenses are  reversed; the case is remanded to the IP and Commercial  Court.},
      url = {http://tind.wipo.int/record/49135},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad127},
}