@article{49124,
      url = {http://tind.wipo.int/record/49124},
      title = {Comparison Reveals That the Trade Mark Does Not Infringe  the PDO.},
      abstract = {Council Regulation (EC) No. 510/2006, Arts. 4, 5, 13 and  14; Directive 89/104/EEC, Art. 4(4)(d) and (e); Code of  Industrial Property, Arts. 7, 11(4), 12(10), 13 and 14 –  Cacio Romano  Headnotes by the Editorial Office 1. If a  Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) and a trade mark do  not refer to the same class of product, the owner of the  PDO cannot invoke the protection afforded by Council  Regulation (EC) No. 510/2006.  2. When the comparison is  between a PDO and a trade mark, reference to the product  categories of the Nice Classification is irrelevant.  3. To  identify the scope of protection of the PDO, the  description of the product and the method of obtaining it  must be considered, both in the specifications and in the  registration application. These provide an objective  indicator to investigate whether the products are similar  or comparable.  Supreme Court of Cassation, Civil Division,  Section 1 (Corte Suprema di Cassazione, Sez. 1 Civ.),  decision of 20 March 2023 – 7937/2022},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad113},
      recid = {49124},
      pages = {1 online resource (pages  1165–1170)},
}