@article{49121,
      url = {http://tind.wipo.int/record/49121},
      title = {Assessing the Distinctness of a Variety.},
      abstract = {Code of Industrial Property, Art. 104 ‒ Asgrow Seed   Headnotes by the Editorial Office 1. The variety is deemed  distinct when it is clearly distinguishable from any  ‘other’ variety whose existence, on the date of filing  the application, is a matter of common knowledge.  2. Where  it is the same variety, for which the breeder (or their  successor) has applied for plant variety rights to be  granted in another state, the question of a lack of  distinctness does not arise, since the ‘same’ variety  cannot be included in the concept of any ‘other’  variety that is a matter of common knowledge; the same  variety is not therefore relevant for the purposes of the  distinctness assessment provided for by law.  Supreme Court  of Cassation, Civil Division, Section 1 (Corte Suprema di  Cassazione, Sez. 1 Civ.), judgment of 28 February 2023 ‒  6074/2023 Facts of the case The dispute concerns an Italian  patent for a plant variety.},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad106},
      recid = {49121},
      pages = {1 online resource (pages 1149–1151)},
}