\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
Guiding Case No. 157 – : Zuoshang Mingshe Homeware (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v Beijing Zhongrong Hengsheng Wood Industry Co., Ltd. and Nanjing Mengyang Furniture Distribution Center (Copyright Infringement Dispute).
2023
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DataCite | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Cite
Citation
Détails
Title
Guiding Case No. 157 – : Zuoshang Mingshe Homeware (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v Beijing Zhongrong Hengsheng Wood Industry Co., Ltd. and Nanjing Mengyang Furniture Distribution Center (Copyright Infringement Dispute).
Type d’élément
Journal article
Description
1 online resource (pages 1146–1148)
Résumé
(Deliberated and issued by the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) on 23 July 2021)1 Summary of the judgment Artistic creations characterized by their originality, aesthetic attributes, functional elements and reproducibility, wherein the utility can be distinguished from the artistry, are classified as works of applied art and protected by the Copyright Law under the category of works of fine art. Copyrightable artistic works must primarily exhibit authors’ artistry. This is due to the fact that copyright law protects the artistry of works of applied art rather than their utility.
Source of Description
Crossref
Série
GRUR International, 2632-8550 ; 72, 12, 2023.
Ressources liées
Published
[Oxford, England] : Oxford University Press (OUP), 2023
Langue
Anglais
Copyright Information
https://academic.oup.com/grurint/article/72/3/231/6998505
Le document apparaît dans