000049103 000__ 02538cam\a22004095i\4500
000049103 001__ 49103
000049103 003__ SzGeWIPO
000049103 005__ 20240322214814.0
000049103 006__ m    eo  d        
000049103 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000049103 008__ 240321s2023\\\\enk\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000049103 0247_ $$a10.1093/grurint/ikad101$$2doi
000049103 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1427545276
000049103 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000049103 041__ $$aeng
000049103 24504 $$aThe Swiss Federal Supreme Court’s Fire Ring Decision and the Evaluation of Works of Applied Art Under Copyright Law – :$$bA Burning Topic.
000049103 264_1 $$a[Oxford, England] :$$bOxford University Press (OUP),$$c2023
000049103 300__ $$a1 online resource (pages 1063–1067)
000049103 336__ $$atext$$2rdacontent
000049103 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000049103 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000049103 4901_ $$aGRUR International,$$x2632-8550 ;$$v72, 11, 2023
000049103 520__ $$aIn its most recent Fire Ring decision, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court had to rule on the copyright protection of works of applied art for the first time in several years. Works of applied art are included in the Swiss Copyright Act in Art. 2(2)(f) as a separate category of protected works, distinguished from other categories of works because they serve a utilitarian purpose and combine practical applicability with an additional aesthetic appeal. In light of the most recent CJEU decisions regarding copyright protection of works of applied art and industrial design, specifically its decisions in Brompton (GRUR International 2020, 969) and Cofemel (GRUR International 2020, 322) the Swiss Federal Supreme Court had the opportunity – not being directly bound by Union law – to position itself with regard to EU judicial practice and at the same time update its own sparse and partly outdated case law. However, it clearly failed to do so, not only from a legal-theoretical perspective but also from a case-specific perspective, and this raises some additional questions that deserve to be addressed.
000049103 542__ $$fhttps://academic.oup.com/grurint/article/72/3/231/6998505
000049103 588__ $$aCrossref
000049103 590__ $$aPublished online: 11-Oct-23
000049103 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000049103 650_0 $$aCopyright law$$zSwitzerland.
000049103 650_0 $$aJudicial process$$zEuropean Union.
000049103 650_0 $$aCopyright.
000049103 650_0 $$aPatents.
000049103 7001_ $$aRauch, Gregor,$$eauthor.
000049103 7731_ $$tGRUR International$$wGRUR
000049103 830_0 $$aGRUR International,$$x2632-8550 ;$$v72, 11, 2023.
000049103 85641 $$uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad101$$yonline version
000049103 904__ $$aArticle
000049103 980__ $$aGRUR