000049066 000__ 01911cam\a22004455i\4500 000049066 001__ 49066 000049066 003__ SzGeWIPO 000049066 005__ 20240322214806.0 000049066 006__ m eo d 000049066 007__ cr_||||||||||| 000049066 008__ 240321s2023\\\\nyu\\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\\ 000049066 010__ $$a2023026781 000049066 020__ $$a9781108482738$$qPrint 000049066 020__ $$a9781108697613$$qeBook 000049066 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1420155000 000049066 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL 000049066 041__ $$aeng 000049066 05000 $$aKF2979 000049066 08200 $$a346.73048$$223 000049066 24504 $$aThe Cambridge Handbook of Intellectual Property and Social Justice. 000049066 264_1 $$aCambridge, United Kingdom ;$$aNew York, NY :$$bCambridge University Press,$$c2023. 000049066 300__ $$a1 online resource 000049066 336__ $$atext$$2rdacontent 000049066 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia 000049066 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier 000049066 4901_ $$aHBK Cambridge law handbooks 000049066 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 000049066 520__ $$aThroughout most of the twentieth century an exceedingly narrow interpretation and application of the utilitarian rationale for intellectual property protection dominated much of Western intellectual property (IP) law and policy.1 This was especially evident in the United States, wherein an economic incentive/commodification approach to IP social utility pervaded IP jurisprudence and scholarly discourse. 000049066 650_0 $$aIntellectual property$$zUnited States. 000049066 650_0 $$aIntellectual property$$xSocial aspects$$zUnited States. 000049066 650_0 $$aSocial justice$$zUnited States. 000049066 650_0 $$aIntellectual property. 000049066 650_0 $$aPatents. 000049066 7001_ $$aJamar, Steven D.,$$eeditor. 000049066 7001_ $$aMtima, Lateef,$$eeditor. 000049066 830_0 $$aHBK Cambridge law handbooks. 000049066 85641 $$uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-intellectual-property-and-social-justice/981BDAF47503507CCB43ED96FDFADF1A$$yView eBook 000049066 904__ $$aBook 000049066 980__ $$aBIB 000049066 980__ $$aOS