\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
Double Trouble: Canadian Courts Continue to Clarify the Law on Double Patenting : The risk of a double patenting finding may be receding as long as evergreening is avoided.
2010
GB 139
Formatos
| Formato | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DataCite | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Detalles
Título
Double Trouble: Canadian Courts Continue to Clarify the Law on Double Patenting : The risk of a double patenting finding may be receding as long as evergreening is avoided.
Tipo de elemento
Journal article
Descripción
GB 139 May 2010 ; [28] cm
ISSN
2044-7175
Número de llamada alternativo
GB 139
Resúmen
Since the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Camco Inc. v Whirlpool Corp. double patenting has been a common challenge to patent validity. Unfortunately, the Canadian Patent Act provides little guidance as to the scope and application of the prohibition, but recent judicial decisions have attempted to clarify what is effectively a judge-made law.
Publicado
London, England: Informa, U.K. 2010.
Lengua(s)
eng
El registro aparece en