000048725 000__ 02572cam\a22003975i\4500
000048725 001__ 48725
000048725 003__ SzGeWIPO
000048725 005__ 20240118122733.0
000048725 006__ m    eo  d        
000048725 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000048725 008__ 231128s2019    gw|||| |ob||||000|0 eng|d
000048725 020__ $$a9789811328565$$qe-book
000048725 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1412051603
000048725 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$dCaBNVSL
000048725 041__ $$aeng
000048725 24500 $$aWhat Role for Intellectual Property in Industrial Development.$$nChapter.
000048725 264_1 $$a[Singapore] :$$bSpringer Singapore,$$c2019.
000048725 300__ $$a1 online resource (Chapter, pp. 119-126) :
000048725 336__ $$atext$$2rdacontent
000048725 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000048725 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000048725 520__ $$aWide differences in per capita incomes persist across and within different world regions, and economic research has argued that patterns of technology diffusion go a long way in explaining these differences. Yet, looking back at the past 40 years, it is also the case that a number of East Asian economies were able to achieve remarkable industrial development, and today host companies that compete at the world’s technology frontier. A natural question to ask is what role public policies played in spurring successful industrialization. This question seems especially pertinent in relation to technology, given the many market failures associated with knowledge acquisition and knowledge diffusion. A large number of theories have emerged and empirical investigations carried out in search for an answer. In this chapter, we scrutinize the resulting economic literature to provide a perspective on the role of intellectual property in the industrial development process. We do so in the following way. We first contrast the industrial development experience of East Asia to that of Latin America and summarize the explanations economists have offered to account for them (Sect. 2). We then turn to intellectual property and explore the evolution of both IP policies and IP use in the two regions (Sect. 3), before reviewing and critically assessing the empirical literature that has attempted to establish causality between intellectual property and industrial development (Sect. 4). Against this background, we ponder on how policymakers should approach the development of their IP framework as part of broader industrial policy objectives (Sect. 5).
000048725 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000048725 650_0 $$aIndustrialization.
000048725 650_0 $$aPublic policy.
000048725 650_0 $$aCopyright.
000048725 7001_ $$aFink, Carsten,$$eauthor.
000048725 7001_ $$aRaffo, Julio,$$eauthor.
000048725 7102_ $$aSpringer Publishing
000048725 77308 $$iIntellectual Property and Development: Understanding the Interfaces$$aEdited by Carlos Correa and Xavier Seuba$$dSpringer$$z9789811328565
000048725 85640 $$uhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-13-2856-5_7$$zView this Chapter
000048725 904__ $$aBook
000048725 942__ $$2ddc$$cEBOOK
000048725 980__ $$aBIB