000048644 000__ 02860nam\a2200421\i\4500
000048644 001__ 48644
000048644 003__ SzGeWIPO
000048644 005__ 20231204174317.0
000048644 006__ m    eo  d        
000048644 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000048644 008__ 231029s2023\\\\enk\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000048644 0247_ $$a10.1093/grurint/ikad042$$2doi
000048644 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1411270584
000048644 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000048644 041__ $$aeng
000048644 24504 $$aThe War in Ukraine Raises Questions About Patents for Secret Inventions.
000048644 264_1 $$a[Oxford, England] :$$bOxford University Press (OUP),$$c2023
000048644 300__ $$a1 online resource (pages 665–669)
000048644 336__ $$atext$$2rdacontent
000048644 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000048644 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000048644 4901_ $$aGRUR International,$$x2632-8550 ;$$v72, 7, 2023
000048644 520__ $$aPatent information must, in certain circumstances, be prevented from being made available to the public for reasons of national security. This policy imperative deviates from the conventional approach under patent law, which emphasises a bargain with society whereby patent rights are granted in return for disclosure of the invention and communication to the public. How best to achieve a balance between keeping an invention secret for reasons of national security and disclosure of the invention will depend on circumstances that may well change rapidly. The stronger the threat to national security, the more the policy tends to lean toward keeping certain inventions secret. The war in Ukraine brings this patent policy imperative sharply into focus. This opinion undertakes a historical analysis of patent law approaches for keeping inventions secret in key countries and analyses current arrangements for the patent protection of secret inventions in Ukraine. This opinion concludes that Ukraine should consider the long-term implications of keeping patented inventions secret when the war finally comes to an end, having regard to the potentially negative consequences for future innovation. This opinion also recommends that Ukraine provides reasonable compensation for patent proprietors, taking into account the economic losses associated with the fact that secrecy orders will prevent the commercialisation of otherwise potentially lucrative inventions.
000048644 542__ $$fhttps://academic.oup.com/grurint/article/72/3/231/6998505
000048644 588__ $$aCrossref
000048644 590__ $$aPublished online: 02-May-23
000048644 650_0 $$aPatents$$zUkraine.
000048644 650_0 $$aPatents$$xInventions.
000048644 650_0 $$aSecrecy$$xLaw and legislation.
000048644 650_0 $$aPatents.
000048644 650_0 $$aCOVID-19 (Disease)
000048644 7001_ $$aMatthews, Duncan,$$eauthor.
000048644 7001_ $$aOstapenko, Hanna,$$eauthor.
000048644 7731_ $$tGRUR International$$wGRUR
000048644 830_0 $$aGRUR International,$$x2632-8550 ;$$v72, 7, 2023.
000048644 85641 $$uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad042$$yonline version
000048644 904__ $$aArticle
000048644 980__ $$aGRUR