TY  - GEN
AB  - Patent information must, in certain circumstances, be prevented from being made available to the public for reasons of national security. This policy imperative deviates from the conventional approach under patent law, which emphasises a bargain with society whereby patent rights are granted in return for disclosure of the invention and communication to the public. How best to achieve a balance between keeping an invention secret for reasons of national security and disclosure of the invention will depend on circumstances that may well change rapidly. The stronger the threat to national security, the more the policy tends to lean toward keeping certain inventions secret. The war in Ukraine brings this patent policy imperative sharply into focus. This opinion undertakes a historical analysis of patent law approaches for keeping inventions secret in key countries and analyses current arrangements for the patent protection of secret inventions in Ukraine. This opinion concludes that Ukraine should consider the long-term implications of keeping patented inventions secret when the war finally comes to an end, having regard to the potentially negative consequences for future innovation. This opinion also recommends that Ukraine provides reasonable compensation for patent proprietors, taking into account the economic losses associated with the fact that secrecy orders will prevent the commercialisation of otherwise potentially lucrative inventions.
AU  - Matthews, Duncan,
AU  - Ostapenko, Hanna,
DO  - 10.1093/grurint/ikad042
DO  - doi
ID  - 48644
JF  - GRUR International
KW  - Patents
KW  - Patents
KW  - Secrecy
KW  - Patents.
KW  - COVID-19 (Disease)
LA  - eng
LK  - https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad042
N2  - Patent information must, in certain circumstances, be prevented from being made available to the public for reasons of national security. This policy imperative deviates from the conventional approach under patent law, which emphasises a bargain with society whereby patent rights are granted in return for disclosure of the invention and communication to the public. How best to achieve a balance between keeping an invention secret for reasons of national security and disclosure of the invention will depend on circumstances that may well change rapidly. The stronger the threat to national security, the more the policy tends to lean toward keeping certain inventions secret. The war in Ukraine brings this patent policy imperative sharply into focus. This opinion undertakes a historical analysis of patent law approaches for keeping inventions secret in key countries and analyses current arrangements for the patent protection of secret inventions in Ukraine. This opinion concludes that Ukraine should consider the long-term implications of keeping patented inventions secret when the war finally comes to an end, having regard to the potentially negative consequences for future innovation. This opinion also recommends that Ukraine provides reasonable compensation for patent proprietors, taking into account the economic losses associated with the fact that secrecy orders will prevent the commercialisation of otherwise potentially lucrative inventions.
T1  - The War in Ukraine Raises Questions About Patents for Secret Inventions.
TI  - The War in Ukraine Raises Questions About Patents for Secret Inventions.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad042
VL  - 72, 7, 2023
ER  -