TY  - GEN
N2  - The relationship between copyright and design law has again come more into focus as a result of the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) decision in the Cofemel/G-Star case. EU law enables dual protection of designs both through copyright and through design law. Australian copyright law tries to exclude or at least limit dual protection. This article considers the advantages and disadvantages of dual protection and outlines a suggestion for sharpening the distinction between copyright and design law.
DO  - 10.1093/grurint/ikad011
DO  - doi
AB  - The relationship between copyright and design law has again come more into focus as a result of the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) decision in the Cofemel/G-Star case. EU law enables dual protection of designs both through copyright and through design law. Australian copyright law tries to exclude or at least limit dual protection. This article considers the advantages and disadvantages of dual protection and outlines a suggestion for sharpening the distinction between copyright and design law.
T1  - Perspectives on the Relationship Between Copyright and Design Law after Cofemel/G-Star – :The Australian Regulation of Copyright/Design Overlap as a Role Model for European Law?
AU  - Jänich, Volker Michael,
JF  - GRUR International
VL  - 72, 5, 2023
LA  - eng
ID  - 48615
KW  - Copyright law
KW  - Design protection.
KW  - Copyright law
KW  - Copyright.
KW  - COVID-19 (Disease)
TI  - Perspectives on the Relationship Between Copyright and Design Law after Cofemel/G-Star – :The Australian Regulation of Copyright/Design Overlap as a Role Model for European Law?
LK  - https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad011
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad011
ER  -