000048611 000__ 02671nam\a2200433\i\4500 000048611 001__ 48611 000048611 003__ SzGeWIPO 000048611 005__ 20240708150411.0 000048611 006__ m eo d 000048611 007__ cr bn |||m|||a 000048611 008__ 231029s2023\\\\enk\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d 000048611 0247_ $$a10.1093/grurint/ikad024$$2doi 000048611 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1411270381 000048611 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL 000048611 041__ $$aeng 000048611 24500 $$aProportionality Defenses in FRAND Cases :$$ba Comparative Assessment of the Revised German Patent Injunction Rules and U.S. Case Law. 000048611 264_1 $$a[Oxford, England] :$$bOxford University Press (OUP),$$c2023 000048611 300__ $$a1 online resource (pages 435-450) 000048611 336__ $$atext$$2rdacontent 000048611 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia 000048611 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier 000048611 4901_ $$aGRUR International,$$x2632-8550 ;$$v72, 5, 2023 000048611 520__ $$aIn August 2021, the ‘Second Act for the Modernization of Patent Law’ (Zweites Patentrechtsmoderni-sierungsgesetz) introduced an explicit proportionality defense into Sec. 139(1) German Patent Act. Unlike the competition law or national contract law prong of the Huawei defense in FRAND cases, the proportionality defense thus derives from the GPA itself. The new provision has already generated much debate and some initial case law. According to public knowledge, however, it has not yet been raised in a German FRAND case, although it seems inevitable that this will happen. Hence, this article offers to market participants and the judiciary a proposed analytical framework for considering such a proportionality defense in German FRAND cases. For this purpose, it undertakes a comparative assessment of U.S. patent injunction law. As to German law, the focus is on whether the proportionality defense and the FRAND license defense can be raised in parallel, whether FRAND royalties are a suitable basis for calculating an appropriate financial compensation under Sec. 139(1)(4) and how a court should assess whether the impact of an injunction in a FRAND case triggers the proportionality defense. 000048611 542__ $$fhttps://academic.oup.com/grurint/article/72/3/231/6998505 000048611 588__ $$aCrossref 000048611 590__ $$aPublished online: 18-Mar-23 000048611 650_0 $$aPatent law$$zUnited States. 000048611 650_0 $$aFair use (Copyright) 000048611 650_0 $$aRoyalties. 000048611 650_0 $$aPatent law$$zGermany. 000048611 650_0 $$aPatents. 000048611 650_0 $$aCopyright. 000048611 650_0 $$aCOVID-19 (Disease) 000048611 7001_ $$aPicht, Peter Georg,$$eauthor. 000048611 7731_ $$tGRUR International$$wGRUR 000048611 830_0 $$aGRUR International,$$x2632-8550 ;$$v72, 5, 2023. 000048611 85641 $$uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad024$$yonline version 000048611 904__ $$aJournal article 000048611 980__ $$aGRUR