000048256 000__ 01513cam\a22004095i\4500
000048256 001__ 48256
000048256 003__ SzGeWIPO
000048256 005__ 20240708150400.0
000048256 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000048256 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000048256 008__ 230606s2023    nyu|||||o|||||000|0 eng|d
000048256 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1393694323
000048256 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO
000048256 041__ $$aeng
000048256 24500 $$aPreliminary injunctions based on a patent application: a justified solution? (Fingolimod case).
000048256 264_1 $$a[New York, NY] :$$bThomson Reuters,$$c2023
000048256 300__ $$a1 online resource
000048256 336__ $$atext$$2rdacontent
000048256 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000048256 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000048256 4901_ $$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$$x0142-0461 ;$$vVolume 45, Issue 4
000048256 542__ $$fhttps://1.next.westlaw.com/Copyright
000048256 588__ $$aCrossref
000048256 590__ $$aPublished online: 2023
000048256 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000048256 650_0 $$aPatents$$zEuropean Union.
000048256 650_0 $$aPharmaceuticals.
000048256 650_0 $$aHealth.
000048256 650_0 $$aPatents.
000048256 650_0 $$aEconomic development projects$$xDirectories.
000048256 7001_ $$aDhenne, Matthieu,$$eauthor.
000048256 7731_ $$tEuropean Intellectual Property Review
000048256 7731_ $$wEIPR
000048256 830_0 $$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$$x0142-0461 ;$$vE.I.P.R. 2023, 45(4), 236-237
000048256 85641 $$uhttps://www.westlaw.com/Document/IC9689490BC1611ED9820BC5713950B45/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&VR=3.0&RS=cblt1.0&sp=wlnintell-000$$yonline version
000048256 904__ $$aJournal article
000048256 980__ $$aEIPR