000048165 000__ 04031cam\a2200457\i\4500
000048165 001__ 48165
000048165 003__ SzGeWIPO
000048165 005__ 20240119132745.0
000048165 008__ 230517s2019\\\\xx\\\\\\rb\\\\000\0\eng\d
000048165 022__ $$a0193-4864
000048165 035__ $$a(wipo)(CD )04-0372
000048165 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1161775712
000048165 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000048165 041__ $$aeng
000048165 050_4 $$aKF3114.A1$$bP3
000048165 08204 $$a346.7304805$$220
000048165 084__ $$a87$$qUS
000048165 1001_ $$aTripp, Karen B.,$$eEditor
000048165 24500 $$aIntellectual Property Law Review 2019.
000048165 250__ $$aVolume 51
000048165 264_1 $$aDanvers, MA, USA :$$bThomson Reuters,$$c2019.
000048165 300__ $$avii 805 pages ;$$c[28] cm.
000048165 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000048165 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000048165 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000048165 4901_ $$aIntellectual Property Law Review,$$x0193-4864
000048165 5050_ $$aIntroductory Survey by Karen B. Tripp. -- Part I: Patents. -- Infringement, Unbound. -- Roots to Bits: How the History of Plant Patents Can Shape Software’s Future. -- A Patent Reformist Supreme Court and Its Unearthed Precedent. -- Amending ALICE: Eliminating the Undue Burden of “Significantly More”. -- Claiming Design. -- Part II: Trademarks and Trade Dress. -- Beware the Trademark Echo Chamber: Why Federal Courts Should Not Defer To USPTO Decisions. -- The Trademark Disclaimer Provision Of The Lanham Act: Is USPTO Flexibility Worth Litigant Ambiguity? -- Trademark’s Judicial De-evolution: Why Courts Get Trademark Cases Wrong Repeatedly. -- Self Marks. -- Part III: Copyrights. -- An Empirical Study of Transformative Use in Copyright Law. -- Fair Use in the Information Age. -- Is the Copyright Act Inconsistent With the Law of Employee Invention Assignment Contracts? -- Music as a Matter of Law. -- Part IV: Trade Secrets. -- Out of thin Air: Trade Secrets, Cybersecurity, and the Wrongful Acquisition Tort. -- Part V: Intellectual Property. -- Ownership of University Intellectual Property.
000048165 520__ $$aThe articles in this year's edition of the Intellectual Property Law Review reflect topics most often seen in intellectual property related law review articles during the past year. In patents, concerns about the Supreme Court's decision in Alice continue to dominate. After all, some say that Alice is the worst decision by the Supreme Court on patents since passage of the 1952 Patent Act. Certainly Alice's impact on patents is of interest as well as of concern, and an article herein is directed specifically to the Supreme Court's current "patent litigation reform project." That article provides a thoughtful analysis of the Court's twenty-eight reversals of the Federal Circuit in patent cases since the year 2000 and provides reasons for bat Court's actions. One article herein provides a survey of the state of patents now, five years after Alice, and another article proposes special legislation for protecting software, similar to the Plant Variety Protection Act that Congress passed years ago to protect plants. While plants at first may not seem similar to software, there are some remarkable analogies between the two, as both plants and software involve "data manipulation." The articles about trademarks include important topics on subjects that practitioners may not often think about, but should consider. One such article discusses how federal courts' perspectives on trademarks differ from those of the Trademark Office, and why de novo review by a court is beneficial despite the Trademark Office's significant expertise on trademarks. Another article discusses in detail disclaimers of words in composite marks and advises of nuances and potential consequences not always readily appreciated during the trademark registration process. Another article discusses the continuing expansion of trademark law and why correction is needed.
000048165 650_0 $$aPatent laws and legislation$$zUnited States
000048165 650_0 $$aIntellectual property
000048165 650_0 $$aTrademarks
000048165 650_0 $$aPatents
000048165 650_0 $$aCopyright
000048165 650_4 $$aIntellectual property law
000048165 650_4 $$aIntellectual Property$$xGeneral$$xPeriodical
000048165 650_6 $$aBrevets d'invention$$xDroit$$zÉtats-Unis
000048165 903_0 $$aIntellectual Property Law Review
000048165 904__ $$aJournal
000048165 952__ $$w2018-07-30$$p2018-0010$$u42339$$bMAIN$$10$$kUS 87$$v2018-07-30$$zTagged$$70$$yPER
000048165 980__ $$aBIB
000048165 999__ $$c31056$$d31056