000048118 001__ 48118 000048118 003__ SzGeWIPO 000048118 005__ 20230531201420.0 000048118 006__ m eo d 000048118 007__ cr bn |||m|||a 000048118 008__ 230530s2008 enk o 001 0 eng 000048118 020__ $$a9780804763271$$qeBook 000048118 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1380728314 000048118 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL 000048118 041__ $$aeng 000048118 050_4 $$aKF2979 000048118 08204 $$a346.73048$$222 000048118 1001_ $$aLange, David,$$d1938-,$$eauthor. 000048118 24510 $$aNo Law :$$bIntellectual Property in the Image of an Absolute First Amendment. 000048118 264_1 $$aStanford, Calif. :$$bStanford Law Books,$$c2008 000048118 300__ $$a1 online resource 000048118 336__ $$atext$$2rdacontent 000048118 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia 000048118 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier 000048118 500__ $$aOriginally presented as the author's thesis (Doctoral)--Duke University. 000048118 5203_ $$aThe original text of the Constitution grants Congress the power to create a regime of intellectual property protection. The First Amendment, however, prohibits Congress from enacting any law that abridges the freedoms of speech and of the press. While many have long noted the tension between these provisions, recent legal and cultural developments have transformed mere tension into conflict. This book offers a new way to approach these debates. The authors argue that the First Amendment imposes absolute limits upon claims of exclusivity in intellectual property and expression, and strips Congress of the power to restrict personal thought and free expression in the name of intellectual property rights. Though the First Amendment does not repeal the Constitutional intellectual property clause in its entirety, copyright, patent, and trademark law cannot constitutionally license the private commodification of the public domain. The authors claim that while the exclusive rights currently reflected in intellectual property are not in truth needed to encourage intellectual productivity, they develop a compelling solution for how Congress, even within the limits imposed by an absolute First Amendment, can still regulate incentives for intellectual creations. 000048118 588__ $$aOnline resource 000048118 650_0 $$aFreedom of expression. 000048118 650_0 $$aIntellectual property. 000048118 650_4 $$aConstitution (United States). 000048118 650_4 $$aFreedom of expression$$zUnited States 000048118 650_0 $$aIntellectual property$$zUnited States. 000048118 650_4 $$aConstitution 000048118 650_0 $$aIntellectual property$$zUnited States.. 000048118 650_0 $$aCopyright$$zUnited States.. 000048118 650_0 $$aTrademarks$$zUnited States.. 000048118 650_0 $$aPatents$$zUnited States.. 000048118 650_0 $$aConstitutional law. 000048118 651_0 $$aUnited States. 000048118 7001_ $$aLange, David L.,$$eauthor. 000048118 7001_ $$aPowell, Jefferson,$$d1954-$$eauthor. 000048118 85641 $$uhttps://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804745789.001.0001$$yView eBook 000048118 903__ $$aOxford Academic 000048118 980__ $$aOS