TY  - GEN
AB  - The original text of the Constitution grants Congress the power to create a regime of intellectual property protection. The First Amendment, however, prohibits Congress from enacting any law that abridges the freedoms of speech and of the press. While many have long noted the tension between these provisions, recent legal and cultural developments have transformed mere tension into conflict. This book offers a new way to approach these debates. The authors argue that the First Amendment imposes absolute limits upon claims of exclusivity in intellectual property and expression, and strips Congress of the power to restrict personal thought and free expression in the name of intellectual property rights. Though the First Amendment does not repeal the Constitutional intellectual property clause in its entirety, copyright, patent, and trademark law cannot constitutionally license the private commodification of the public domain. The authors claim that while the exclusive rights currently reflected in intellectual property are not in truth needed to encourage intellectual productivity, they develop a compelling solution for how Congress, even within the limits imposed by an absolute First Amendment, can still regulate incentives for intellectual creations.
AU  - Lange, David,
AU  - Lange, David L.,
AU  - Powell, Jefferson,
CN  - KF2979
ID  - 48118
KW  - Freedom of expression.
KW  - Intellectual property.
KW  - Constitution (United States).
KW  - Freedom of expression
KW  - Intellectual property
KW  - Constitution
KW  - Intellectual property
KW  - Copyright
KW  - Trademarks
KW  - Patents
KW  - Constitutional law.
LA  - eng
LK  - https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804745789.001.0001
N1  - Originally presented as the author's thesis (Doctoral)--Duke University.
N2  - The original text of the Constitution grants Congress the power to create a regime of intellectual property protection. The First Amendment, however, prohibits Congress from enacting any law that abridges the freedoms of speech and of the press. While many have long noted the tension between these provisions, recent legal and cultural developments have transformed mere tension into conflict. This book offers a new way to approach these debates. The authors argue that the First Amendment imposes absolute limits upon claims of exclusivity in intellectual property and expression, and strips Congress of the power to restrict personal thought and free expression in the name of intellectual property rights. Though the First Amendment does not repeal the Constitutional intellectual property clause in its entirety, copyright, patent, and trademark law cannot constitutionally license the private commodification of the public domain. The authors claim that while the exclusive rights currently reflected in intellectual property are not in truth needed to encourage intellectual productivity, they develop a compelling solution for how Congress, even within the limits imposed by an absolute First Amendment, can still regulate incentives for intellectual creations.
SN  - 9780804763271
T1  - No Law :Intellectual Property in the Image of an Absolute First Amendment.
TI  - No Law :Intellectual Property in the Image of an Absolute First Amendment.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804745789.001.0001
ER  -