000048027 000__ 00965cam\a22003855i\4500
000048027 001__ 48027
000048027 003__ SzGeWIPO
000048027 005__ 20240708150356.0
000048027 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000048027 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000048027 008__ 230328s2023\\\\sz\\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000048027 022__ $$aOnline: 2045-9815
000048027 0247_ $$a10.4337/qmjip.2022.04.06$$2doi
000048027 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1296156375
000048027 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000048027 041__ $$aeng
000048027 1001_ $$aHartwig, Henning,
000048027 24500 $$aA critical review of recent design case law by the General Court of the European Union.
000048027 260__ $$aEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.$$c2023
000048027 300__ $$a1 online resource (553-563 pages)
000048027 336__ $$atext$$2rdacontent
000048027 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000048027 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000048027 4901_ $$aQueen Mary Journal Of Intellectual Property ;$$v12, 3, 2022, pp. 553-563.
000048027 588__ $$aCrossref
000048027 590__ $$aPublished online: 28-Feb-23
000048027 650_0 $$aTraditional Knowledge.
000048027 650_0 $$aIntellectual Property Law.
000048027 7730_ $$tQueen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property$$wQMJ
000048027 830_0 $$aQueen Mary Journal Of Intellectual Property ;$$v12, 4, 2023, pp. 553-563.
000048027 85641 $$uhttps://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/12/4/article-p553.xml$$yOnline version
000048027 904__ $$aJournal article
000048027 980__ $$aQMJ