000048006 000__ 02562cam\a22003255i\4500
000048006 001__ 48006
000048006 003__ SzGeWIPO
000048006 005__ 20240708150355.0
000048006 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000048006 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000048006 008__ 230316s2012\\\\enk\\\\\o\\\\\001\0\eng\\
000048006 020__ $$a9780199933273$$qeBook
000048006 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO
000048006 041__ $$aeng
000048006 1001_ $$aDinwoodie, Graeme B.,$$eauthor.
000048006 1001_ $$aDreyfuss, Rochelle C.,$$eauthor.
000048006 24500 $$aA Neofederalist Vision of TRIPS:$$bThe Resilience of the International Intellectual Property Regime
000048006 264_1 $$aOxford:$$bOxford University Press,$$c2012
000048006 300__ $$a1 online resource
000048006 336__ $$atext$$2rdacontent
000048006 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000048006 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000048006 5203_ $$aThis book examines the TRIPS Agreement: its interpretation, its impact on the creative environment, and its effect on national and international lawmaking. It propounds a vision of TRIPS as creating a neofederalist regime, one that will ensure the resilience of the international intellectual property system in time of rapid change. In this vision, WTO members retain considerable flexibility to tailor intellectual property law to their national priorities and to experiment with changes necessary to meet new technological and social challenges, but agree to operate within an international framework. This framework, while less powerful than the central administration of a federal government, comprises a series of substantive and procedural commitments that promote the coordination of both the present intellectual property system as well as future international intellectual property lawmaking. Part I demonstrates the centrality of national autonomy throughout the history of international negotiations over intellectual property. Part II analyzes the decisions of the WTO in intellectual property cases, and finds them lacking in many respects. Looking to the future, Part III develops a framework for integrating the increasingly fragmented international system and proposes the recognition of an international intellectual property acquis, a set of longstanding principles that have informed, and should continue to inform intellectual property lawmaking. The acquis would include both express and latent components of the international regime, put access-regarding guarantees such as user rights on a par with proprietary interests and enshrine the fundamental importance of national autonomy in the international system.
000048006 588__ $$aOnline resource
000048006 650_0 $$aIntellectual property (International law)
000048006 650_0 $$aForeign trade regulation
000048006 650_0 $$aIntellectual property law
000048006 650_0 $$aTrade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS)
000048006 85641 $$uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304619.001.0001$$yView eBook
000048006 903__ $$aOxford Academic
000048006 904__ $$aJournal article
000048006 980__ $$aOS