000047980 000__ 02667cam\a22003255i\4500
000047980 001__ 47980
000047980 003__ SzGeWIPO
000047980 005__ 20240708150354.0
000047980 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000047980 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000047980 008__ 230310s2019\\\\enk\\\\\o\\\\\001\0\eng\\
000047980 020__ $$a9780191878039$$qeBook
000047980 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO
000047980 041__ $$aeng
000047980 1001_ $$aErdos, David,$$eauthor.
000047980 24500 $$aEuropean Data Protection Regulation, Journalism, and Traditional Publishers:$$bBalancing on a Tightrope?
000047980 264_1 $$aOxford:$$bOxford University Press,$$c2019
000047980 300__ $$a1 online resource
000047980 336__ $$atext$$2rdacontent
000047980 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000047980 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000047980 5203_ $$aThis book explores the interface between European data protection and the freedom of expression activities of traditional journalism, professional artists, and both academic and non-academic writers from both an empirical and normative perspective. It draws on an exhaustive examination of both historical and contemporary public domain material and a comprehensive questionnaire of European Data Protection Authorities (DPAs). Empirically it is found that, notwithstanding an often confusing statutory landscape, DPAs have sought to develop an approach to regulating the journalistic media based on contextual rights balancing. However, they have struggled to secure a clear and specified criterion of strictness as regards standard-setting or a consistent and reliable approach to enforcement. DPAs have appeared even more confused as regards other traditional publishers, largely abstaining from regulating most professional artists and writers but attempting to subject all academic disciplines to onerous statutory restrictions established for medical, scientific, and related research. From these findings, it is argued that balancing contextual rights has value and should be both generalized across all traditional publishers and systematically and sensitively developed through structured and robust co-regulation. Such co-regulation should adopt the new code of conduct and monitoring provisions included in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) as a broad guideline. DPAs should accord strong deference to any codes and monitoring bodies which verifiably meet the accredited criteria but must engage more proactively when these are absent. In any case, DPAs should also intervene directly as regards particularly serious or systematic issues and have an increasingly important role in ensuring a joined-up approach between traditional publishing and new media activity.
000047980 588__ $$aOnline resource
000047980 650_0 $$aData protection$$xLaw and legislation$$zEuropean Union countries
000047980 650_0 $$aJournalism$$xLaw and legislation$$zEuropean Union countries
000047980 650_0 $$aPress law$$zEuropean Union countries
000047980 85641 $$uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198841982.001.0001$$yView eBook
000047980 903__ $$aOxford Academic
000047980 904__ $$aJournal article
000047980 980__ $$aOS