\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
Misallocation of scientific credit: the role of hierarchy and preferences.
2020
Форматы
| Формат | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DataCite | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Полное описание
Название
Misallocation of scientific credit: the role of hierarchy and preferences.
Тип объекта
Journal article
ISSN
0960-6491 (Print) 1464-3650 (Online)
Резюме
We extend the results in Lissoni et al. (2013, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 95, 49–69) on scientific credit misallocation, as measured by misalignment between authorship and inventorship recognition in patent-publication pairs. Extending the analysis to European data, we confirm that, other things being equal, the probability of exclusion of a scientific author from a publication-related patent declines with seniority and increases for women. In addition, we find that the senior scientists’ power to exclude other authors plays a more important role in explaining the patterns of exclusion than differences in authors’ attribution preferences. The unfavorable treatment of young and/or female scientists emerges in particular when patents are owned by companies or individuals, thus providing a warning flag on those institutional arrangements that favor company or individual ownership of academic patents.
Серии
Industrial and Corporate Change INCC 2020, 29(6), 1471–1482
Взаимосвязанные ресурсы
Опубликовано
Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press, 2020.
Язык(и)
eng
Информация об авторском праве
https://academic.oup.com/pages/using-the-content/citation
Запись имеется в