000047739 000__ 01610cam\a22003255i\4500
000047739 001__ 47739
000047739 003__ SzGeWIPO
000047739 005__ 20240708150348.0
000047739 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000047739 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000047739 008__ 230131s2022\\\\nyu\\\\\\b\\\\000\0\eng\d
000047739 022__ $$a0960-6491 (Print)$$a1464-3650 (Online)
000047739 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO
000047739 041__ $$aeng
000047739 24500 $$aReconsidering macroeconomic policy prescriptions with meta-analysis.
000047739 264_1 $$aOxford, UK :$$bOxford University Press,$$c2022.
000047739 336__ $$atext$$2rdacontent
000047739 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000047739 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000047739 4901_ $$aIndustrial and Corporate Change$$vVolume 31, Issue 2
000047739 5203_ $$aThis paper investigates recent developments in meta-analysis, the tool to quantitatively synthesize research in a certain body of literature. After providing a brief overview on how to do a meta-analysis and discussing recent methodological advancements, I review applied contributions to the field of macroeconomics. It turns out that meta-analyses have often questioned the conventional wisdom and established new consensuses in fiscal, monetary, and labor market policies by uncovering substantial publication bias and unexpected determining factors in many bodies of literature—in particular those dominated by policy conclusions in the neoclassical tradition like minimum wages, central bank strategies, financial regulation and the relative effects of tax and spending policies.
000047739 542__ $$fhttps://academic.oup.com/pages/using-the-content/citation
000047739 590__ $$aPublished online: 2022
000047739 650_0 $$aMacroeconomics
000047739 650_0 $$aFiscal policy
000047739 7001_ $$aGechert, Sebastian,$$vauthor.
000047739 7731_ $$tIndustrial and Corporate Change,$$wINCC
000047739 830_0 $$aIndustrial and Corporate Change$$vINCC 2022, 31(2), 576–590
000047739 85641 $$uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtac005$$yRead the Article
000047739 904__ $$aJournal article
000047739 980__ $$aINCC