000047345 000__ 00963cam\a22003855i\4500
000047345 001__ 47345
000047345 003__ SzGeWIPO
000047345 005__ 20240708150335.0
000047345 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000047345 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000047345 008__ 221117s2022\\\\sz\\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000047345 022__ $$aOnline: 2045-9815
000047345 0247_ $$a10.4337/qmjip.2022.03.01$$2doi
000047345 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1296156375
000047345 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000047345 041__ $$aeng
000047345 1001_ $$aGeorge, Rukma.
000047345 24500 $$aNature of a film contributing author’s ‘right to royalty’ under Indian copyright law:$$ban analysis.
000047345 260__ $$aEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.$$c2022
000047345 300__ $$a1 online resource (312–327 pages)
000047345 336__ $$atext$$2rdacontent
000047345 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000047345 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000047345 4901_ $$aQueen Mary Journal Of Intellectual Property ;$$v12, 3, 2022, pp. 312–327.
000047345 588__ $$aCrossref
000047345 590__ $$aPublished online: 31-Oct-22
000047345 650_0 $$aCopyright.
000047345 650_0 $$aIntellectual Property Law.
000047345 7730_ $$tQueen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property$$wQMJ
000047345 830_0 $$aQueen Mary Journal Of Intellectual Property ;$$v12, 3, 2022, pp. 312–327.
000047345 85641 $$uhttps://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/12/3/article-p312.xml$$yOnline version
000047345 904__ $$aJournal article
000047345 980__ $$aQMJ