000046368 000__ 00955cam\a22003735i\4500
000046368 001__ 46368
000046368 003__ SzGeWIPO
000046368 005__ 20240708150240.0
000046368 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000046368 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000046368 008__ 220616s2022\\\\enk\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000046368 0247_ $$a10.1093/jiplp/jpac042$$2doi
000046368 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1335038927
000046368 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000046368 041__ $$aeng
000046368 24500 $$aConsequences of the CJEU’s Bayer v Richter decision.
000046368 264_1 $$a[Oxford, England] :$$bOxford University Press (OUP),$$c2022
000046368 300__ $$a1 online resource (pages 526-539)
000046368 336__ $$atext$$2rdacontent
000046368 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000046368 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000046368 4901_ $$aJournal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$$x1747-1540 ;$$v17, 6, 2022
000046368 542__ $$fhttps://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article/17/6/526/6582245
000046368 588__ $$aCrossref
000046368 590__ $$aPublished online: 07-May-22
000046368 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000046368 650_4 $$aPatent Law.
000046368 7001_ $$aTilmann, Winfried,$$eauthor.
000046368 7731_ $$tJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice$$wjiplp
000046368 830_0 $$aJournal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice ;$$v17, 6, 2022.
000046368 85641 $$uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac042$$yOnline version
000046368 904__ $$aJournal article
000046368 980__ $$aJIPLP