000046156 000__ 03289cam\a22004095i\4500
000046156 001__ 46156
000046156 003__ SzGeWIPO
000046156 005__ 20240708150230.0
000046156 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000046156 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000046156 008__ 220524s2021\\\\sz\\\\\\\\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000046156 0247_ $$a10.31616/asj.2019.0300$$2doi
000046156 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1335039135
000046156 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000046156 041__ $$aeng
000046156 24500 $$aComparing the Effectiveness of the Muscle Energy Technique and Kinesiotaping in Mechanical Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction :$$bA Non-blinded, Two-Group, Pretest–Posttest Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol.
000046156 264_1 $$aKorea:$$bKorean Spine Society,$$c2021
000046156 300__ $$a1 volume
000046156 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000046156 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000046156 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000046156 4901_ $$aAsian Spine Journal ;$$vVolume 15, no. 1, 2021.
000046156 500__ $$aISSN:  2076-3417
000046156 500__ $$aThis resource was extracted from the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
000046156 520__ $$aStudy Design Two-group, pretest–posttest randomized clinical trial. Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of the muscle energy technique (MET) and Kinesiotaping (KT) in addition to conventional physiotherapy among patients with mechanical sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD). Overview of Literature Patients with SIJD suffer from lower back and gluteal pain, as well as stiffness, due to restricted pelvic joint movement. To restore function and reduce pain among individuals with mechanical SIJD, the MET and KT may be helpful. However, a limited number of studies have compared MET and KT in mechanical SIJD. Methods A total of 40 male and female participants aging between 30 and 50 years experiencing unilateral pain around the gluteal area, groin area, and lower limbs for more than 4 weeks but less than 1 year will be selected. Patients will then be randomized into two groups: METCp (n=20) and KTCp groups (n=20). The METCp group will receive MET along with conventional physiotherapy, while the KTCp group will receive conventional physiotherapy with KT. Both groups will receive three alternating days of treatment per week that will continue for 4 weeks. The modified Oswestry Disability Index, a digital pressure algometer, and sacroiliac joint motion testing will be used for evaluation. Between- and within-group pre- and post-intervention results for mechanical SIJD were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test/paired t-test and Mann-Whitney U -test/independent t -test. Results Modified Oswestry Disability Index, digital pressure algometer, and sacroiliac joint motion will be measured at baseline, 2nd week during intervention, and 4th week at the end of intervention Conclusions The present study will provide data regarding the effects of MET and KT among patients with mechanical SIJD.
000046156 588__ $$aCrossref
000046156 590__ $$aPublished online: Feb-21
000046156 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000046156 650_0 $$aMedicine.
000046156 7001_ $$aSarkar, Manisha,$$eauthor.
000046156 7001_ $$aGoyal, Manu,$$eauthor.
000046156 7001_ $$aSamuel, Asir John,$$eauthor.
000046156 830_0 $$aAsian Spine Journal;$$vVolume 15, no. 1, 2021.
000046156 85641 $$uhttps://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0300$$yOnline version
000046156 85648 $$3Abstract with links to full text$$uhttps://dx.doi.org/
000046156 904__ $$aJournal article
000046156 980__ $$aBIB