000045948 000__ 00937cam\a22003855i\4500
000045948 001__ 45948
000045948 003__ SzGeWIPO
000045948 005__ 20240708150221.0
000045948 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000045948 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000045948 008__ 220429s2022\\\\sz\\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000045948 022__ $$aOnline: 2045-9815
000045948 0247_ $$a10.4337/qmjip.2022.01.08$$2doi
000045948 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1296156375
000045948 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000045948 041__ $$aeng
000045948 1001_ $$aHartwig, Henning.
000045948 24500 $$aCommunity design infringement test before the General Court – an unfortunate setback
000045948 260__ $$aEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.$$c2022
000045948 300__ $$a158-163 pages
000045948 336__ $$atext$$2rdacontent
000045948 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000045948 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000045948 4901_ $$aQueen Mary Journal Of Intellectual Property ;$$v12, 1, 2022, pp. 158-163.
000045948 588__ $$aCrossref
000045948 590__ $$aPublished online: 28-Feb-22
000045948 650_4 $$aCommunity design.
000045948 650_4 $$aIntellectual Property.
000045948 7730_ $$tQueen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property$$wQMJ
000045948 830_0 $$aQueen Mary Journal Of Intellectual Property ;$$v12, 1, 2022, pp. 158-163.
000045948 85641 $$uhttps://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/12-1/qmjip.2022.01.08.xml$$yOnline version
000045948 904__ $$aJournal article
000045948 980__ $$aQMJ