000043701 000__ 00936nam\a2200361\i\4500
000043701 001__ 43701
000043701 003__ SzGeWIPO
000043701 005__ 20240708150008.0
000043701 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000043701 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000043701 008__ 210521s2020\\\\nju\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000043701 022__ $$aOnline: 1747-1796
000043701 0247_ $$a10.1111/jwip.12168$$2doi
000043701 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1255904346
000043701 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000043701 041__ $$aeng
000043701 24500 $$aQuis custodet custodes? :$$bReferral G-3/19 before the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal and the imperative of challenging the board's interpretation of Art. 53(b) EPC.
000043701 264_1 $$a[Hoboken, New Jersey] :$$bJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd,$$c2020
000043701 300__ $$a1 online resource (pages 6679-711)
000043701 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000043701 4901_ $$aJournal Of World Intellectual Property,$$x1747-1796 ;$$v23, 5-6, 2020
000043701 588__ $$aCrossref
000043701 590__ $$aPublished online: 26-Aug-20
000043701 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000043701 7001_ $$aCockbain, Julian,$$eauthor.
000043701 7001_ $$aSterckx, Sigrid,$$eauthor.
000043701 7731_ $$tJournal of World Intellectual Property$$wJWIP
000043701 830_0 $$aJournal Of World Intellectual Property ;$$v23, 5-6, 2020.
000043701 85641 $$uhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12168$$yOnline version
000043701 904__ $$aJournal article
000043701 980__ $$aJWIP