000043597 000__ 00911nam\a2200361\i\4500
000043597 001__ 43597
000043597 003__ SzGeWIPO
000043597 005__ 20240708150003.0
000043597 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000043597 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000043597 008__ 210511s2019\\\\enk\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000043597 022__ $$aOnline: 1747-1540
000043597 0247_ $$a10.1093/jiplp/jpz043$$2doi
000043597 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1255906230
000043597 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000043597 041__ $$aeng
000043597 24502 $$aA reasoned and reasonable argument to untangle the derivative works right.
000043597 264_1 $$a[Oxford, England] :$$bOxford University Press (OUP),$$c2019
000043597 300__ $$a1 online resource (pages 506-507)
000043597 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000043597 4901_ $$aJournal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$$x1747-1540 ;$$v14, 6, 2019
000043597 542__ $$fhttps://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article/14/6/506/5424105
000043597 588__ $$aCrossref
000043597 590__ $$aPublished online: 01-Apr-19
000043597 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000043597 7001_ $$aJütte, Bernd Justin,$$eauthor.
000043597 7731_ $$tJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice$$wjiplp
000043597 830_0 $$aJournal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice ;$$v14, 6, 2019.
000043597 85641 $$uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpz043$$yOnline version
000043597 904__ $$aJournal article
000043597 980__ $$aJIPLP