000043490 000__ 00954nam\a2200373\i\4500
000043490 001__ 43490
000043490 003__ SzGeWIPO
000043490 005__ 20240708145957.0
000043490 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000043490 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000043490 008__ 210511s2019\\\\enk\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000043490 022__ $$aOnline: 1747-1540
000043490 0247_ $$a10.1093/jiplp/jpz142$$2doi
000043490 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1255905145
000043490 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000043490 041__ $$aeng
000043490 24500 $$aApplication for an interim injunction in UK patent infringement dispute rejected.
000043490 264_1 $$a[Oxford, England] :$$bOxford University Press (OUP),$$c2019
000043490 300__ $$a1 online resource (pages 924-926)
000043490 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000043490 4901_ $$aJournal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$$x1747-1540 ;$$v14, 12, 2019
000043490 542__ $$fhttps://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article-abstract/14/12/924/5678607
000043490 588__ $$aCrossref
000043490 590__ $$aPublished online: 16-Dec-19
000043490 650_0 $$aPatent infringement.
000043490 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000043490 7001_ $$aSmith, Leigh,$$eauthor.
000043490 7731_ $$tJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice$$wjiplp
000043490 830_0 $$aJournal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice ;$$v14, 12, 2019.
000043490 85641 $$uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpz142$$yOnline version
000043490 904__ $$aJournal article
000043490 980__ $$aJIPLP