000043077 000__ 00989nam\a2200349\i\4500
000043077 001__ 43077
000043077 003__ SzGeWIPO
000043077 005__ 20240708145844.0
000043077 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000043077 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000043077 008__ 210416s2020\\\\enk\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000043077 022__ $$aOnline: 2044-7175
000043077 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1255905190
000043077 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000043077 041__ $$aeng
000043077 24500 $$aProcess due :$$bAs social media platforms struggle against the tide of copyright infringements and counterfeit goods, due process may help stem the flow.
000043077 264_1 $$a[London, England] :$$bInforma Law,$$c2020
000043077 300__ $$a1 online resource (pages 17)
000043077 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000043077 4901_ $$aIntellectual Property Magazine,$$x2044-7175 ;$$vFebruary, 2020
000043077 542__ $$fhttps://www.intellectualpropertymagazine.com/copyright/process-due--1.htm
000043077 588__ $$aCrossref
000043077 590__ $$aPublished online: 24-Jan-20
000043077 650_0 $$aCopyright infringement.
000043077 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000043077 7001_ $$aKnoepfel, Eva,$$eauthor.$$uKing’s College London.
000043077 7731_ $$tIntellectual Property Magazine$$wIPM
000043077 830_0 $$aIntellectual Property Magazine ;$$vFebruary, 2020.
000043077 85641 $$uhttps://www.intellectualpropertymagazine.com/copyright/process-due--1.htm$$yonline version
000043077 904__ $$aJournal article
000043077 980__ $$aIPM